There is nothing “just” about our “criminal justice system.” Article by the Vera Institute of Justice
So, we at Vera refuse to call it that. Instead, we call it the “criminal legal system.”
Used to describe policing, prosecution, courts, and corrections in the United States, the criminal legal system’s racially biased policing and draconian punishment has destroyed countless lives and wasted innumerable resources—all while failing to ensure public safety.
Bottom line: Accuracy in language matters, and these systems do not deliver justice.
When we tell the story of justice in the U.S. through the lens of the harmful “criminal legal system,” we get closer to recognizing its long history of harm—particularly for people of color, immigrants, and people experiencing poverty.
Harmful words can promote dangerous stereotypes and stoke fear, and when we stigmatize people who have been convicted of a crime, we make it harder for them to thrive. Ninety-five percent of people in state prisons will be released and return home—that is why it is so crucial that their humanity is not stripped from them. This is not just a moral imperative; it is a civic responsibility.
That is why Vera doesn’t call a person who was convicted of a crime a “criminal,” “felon,” or “offender.” These words define people only by an act and don’t leave space for growth. We focus on person-first language in order to acknowledge individuals’ humanity and dignity. We say that a “person is convicted of a crime” or describe a “person who is incarcerated.”
Inaccurate language facilitates the systemic, inhumane treatment of groups of people. This is certainly true for people who have interacted with the criminal legal system. And we hope that you will join Vera in this important work to affirm and celebrate human dignity.
Vera Institute of Justice
Words Matter: Don’t Call People Felons, Convicts, or Inmates
Erica Bryant Associate Director of Writing
Mar 31, 2021
When Jerome R. Wright was incarcerated, corrections officers called him by his identification number instead of his name. “The minute you are arrested, the language begins to be totally derogatory, debasing, and dehumanizing,” said Wright, statewide organizer for the #HALTsolitary Campaign in New York.
Throughout history and across the world, dehumanizing language has facilitated the systemic, inhumane treatment of groups of people. This is certainly the case for people impacted by the U.S. criminal legal and immigration systems, and that’s why it’s so important to use language that actively asserts humanity. Many people and organizations are moving away from using terms that objectify and make people’s involvement with these systems the defining feature of their identities. But many others—politicians, media outlets, and more—still use harmful and outdated language like “convict,” “inmate,” “felon,” “prisoner,” and “illegal immigrant.”
There are better alternatives—alternatives that center a person’s humanity first and foremost. These include “person who was convicted of a crime,” “person who is incarcerated,” “person convicted of a felony,” and “person seeking lawful status.” These words and phrases matter. Choosing people-first language is a step toward asserting the dignity of those entangled in these dehumanizing systems.
- Illegal immigrant
- Illegal alien
- Person convicted of a crime
- Person who was convicted of a felony
- Person who is on parole
- Person who is incarcerated
- Person seeking lawful status
- Person without lawful status
- Person in immigration detention
Calling a person who was convicted of a crime a “criminal,” “felon,” or “offender” defines them only by a past act and does not account for their full humanity or leave space for growth. These words also promote dangerous stereotypes and stoke fear, which stigmatize people who have been convicted of crimes and make it harder for them to thrive.
“Until this carceral state and the people of this country begin to understand the power of the words that seek to dehumanize the incarcerated or justice-impacted people, there will never be a real and substantive conversation about criminal justice reform,” said Wright. “Our humanity is maintained and respected by not referring to us in those impersonal and definitive terms, but by acknowledging our intrinsic value as human and not by defining us by the worst day or act in our lives.”
Some institutions have created policies to combat dehumanizing language. The New York City Council, for example, no longer allows city correction officers to refer to people in jails as “packages” or “bodies.” And the Biden administration recently directed U.S. Department of Homeland Security officials to stop using “alien” and “illegal alien” to refer to people without immigration documents.
But unfortunately, dehumanizing language has figured prominently in discussions over whether COVID-19 vaccines should be made available for people in prisons. More than one governor has used dehumanizing descriptions of people in prisons to explain their refusals to follow Centers for Disease Control guidelines and prioritize vaccines for people who are in congregate settings where air circulation is poor and social distancing is not possible.
Language is powerful. It shapes thoughts and attitudes, and it can have a serious effect on how a society sees and treats groups of people. People who are impacted by the criminal legal and immigration systems are too often denied their dignity. We can all work to show them respect by using language that asserts their humanity.
As Wright said, “If you can’t see me as [a] human being, then you will never treat me as a human being. And I can never escape the parameters of the system.”